mtl911truth Rotating Header Image

Nenki à Montréal ce weekend

5 Comments

  1. Jacob Schwartz says:

    Nenki isn’t a Michel Chossudovsky, David Ray Griffin, Wayne Madsen, Michael Ruppert, Daniel Hopsicker,etc… Nenki goes into too many grey areas that he discredits many of the credible reserachers and activists who are exposing crimes in high places.

    He approaches subjects such as the Illuminati, Jesuit, Vatican,Queen of England as fact
    when I don’t think there is much of it.

    It is for this reason that I’m happy that the next 9/11 lecture in Montreal is going under the banner of http://www.world911truth.org—-and— http://www.globalresearch.ca, and not mtl911truth.org

  2. Patrick says:

    Nenk is an ally. And gets less visibility than all those names you mentioned, He also dedicates his life to many subjects which bring all sorts of truth-seekers together.

  3. Fredd says:

    “Nenki isn’t a Michel Chossudovsky, David Ray Griffin, Wayne Madsen, Michael Ruppert, Daniel Hopsicker,etc… Nenki goes into too many grey areas that he discredits many of the credible reserachers and activists who are exposing crimes in high places.

    He approaches subjects such as the Illuminati, Jesuit, Vatican,Queen of England as fact
    when I don’t think there is much of it.”

    I very much agree with what you say about Nenki.

    But hey, Mike Ruppert? you seem to give credit to this useless strawman.

    You didn’t know that Mike Ruppert is one of the first biggest shill that got exposed in the 911 truth movement?

    You really give credit to this obvious most recognizes SHILL (disinfo agent) Mike Rppert?

    Hello? Is there a brain in this head, Mr Schwartz?

  4. Marie-Claude Ginette Montpetit says:

    Je seconde l’opinion de Michael.

    Je suis la preuve vivante que Nenki voit des complots où il n’en existe pas, car lors ce qu’il a supposé que j’avais fui le Canada pour subtiliser quelques dollars à des lecteurs potentiels, il se gourait complètement et il a fait énormément de dommages à la distribution de mon livre.

    C’est facule de lançer des rumeurs, moins aisé de les prouver.

    Salutations,

  5. Jacob Schwartz says:

    Allo Fred,

    Ruppert was one of the 1st people like Chossudovsky to blow the 9/11 story wide-open.
    He was the 1st 9/11 researcher who introduced me to the lies of 9/11 in 2003 with his speech in some American university. If I recall correctly,both he and Chossudovsky shared the stage when they spoke in Toronto on 9/11 shortly after the attacks. As far as I could tell Cynthia Mckinney and 9/11 researcher Prof. Peter Dale Scott are both friends of Ruppert.

    Prior to that he had done amazing work on other issues like the drug economy. His newsletter “From The Wilderness”employed some excellent writers such as former US Army Sergeant Stan Goff and Jamey Hecht, whom I listened to speak in person on 9/11 when he and Ruppert were one of many high profile speakers to take part in Barrie Zwicker’s 2004 mega conference on 9/11 in Toronto.

    Alright, so Ruppert is big on Peak Oil. Is that reason to assume he’s a shill, a fraud , an agent of some sort, etc…? Is he the only high profile 9/11,now former, researcher and/or professional to support his thesis on P.O.? No. Even Professor Daniele Ganser from Switzerland is on the same page as he. Ganser seems to be very honest and knowledgable. Many know of him from his work as a security studies professor and his popular book ”Nato’s Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and Western Terrorism.”

    But these two are not the only two high profile people on 9/11 to have a difference of opinion on other controversial issues. Webster Tarpley spoke here in Montreal in 2007
    and I later learned that Michel Chossudovsky isn’t in agreement with all his views on subjects other than 9/11. In addition,in 2008,when David Ray Griffin had supper with Chossudovsky and many of us in Montreal he expressed his support for global warming being a result of us humans polluting the earth while Michel disagreed.
    Alex Jones and other right wing Americans seems to think that the UN ’s agenda is to undermine US sovereignty and to run a global govt. Many 9/11 researchers from the left
    believe this , at least in part,to be inaccurate or a distortion of reality.
    Many truthers are divided on the Zeitgeist thesis of religion. I could go on but I think you get my message.

    I don’t know if Ruppert and Ganser are right or wrong about Peak Oil. Nor do you know for sure if he’s an agent of some kind. If he’s any agent why would his office be ransacked and then later suffer from a medical condition that could have killed him? These two circumstances have forced him on the sidelines and his decision to no longer be a public figure.

Leave a Reply